An interesting link to a journal article from Infants and Young Children.
Although written in 2005, the article examines 6 myths that might still be on the minds of people today. The six myths examined are listed below.
Myth #1 AAC is a “last resort” in speech-language intervention.
Myth #2 AAC hinders or stops further speech development.
Myth #3 Children must have a certain set of skills to be able to benefit from AAC.
Myth #4 Speech-generating AAC devices are only for children with intact cognition.
Myth #5 Children have to be a certain age to be able to benefit from AAC.
Myth #6 There is a representational hierarchy of symbols from objects to written words (traditional orthography)
In examining the myths, I think we can already see that they are just that, myths. It is however interesting to read the arguments about the myths. Some may agree that they hold true today. THen we have to think of how AAC has evolved since 2005, especially since the invention of the iPod and now the iPad. How do these interruptive technologies play into the validity of these myths?
Augmentative Communication and Early Intervention Myths and Realities Written by: MaryAnn Romski, PhD, CCC-SLP; Rose A. Sevcik, PhD
Taken from: Infants & Young Children, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 174–185 c 2005
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
A second report that I found was from McMaster University. Enhancing Fitness, Adaptive Motor Function, and Participation of Children with Cerebral Palsy Classified in Levels IV and V written by Robert J. Palisano & Karen Lally. The report addresses adaptive motor function for persons with CP. In the report the authors discuss various forms of assistive technology such as seating systems, adaptive standing and walking, positioning and transfers, wheeled mobility both powered and manual. What I really liked about this report is first, it was Canadian and second within the report were links to various companies and providers of these technologies.